What about saving shooting (from EU eurocrats)?
Posted: Tue May 21, 2013 3:05 pm
I don't know how many E21 owners are keen on shooting (other than Lars)
But It seems the EU can't it keep its nose out of anything?
http://www.basc.org.uk/en/media/key_iss ... 313F7CFE14
I'd take the BASC approach on this - as the questions are biased for additional EU powers and controls select option 1 for everything, otherwise the next thing we'll find is the EU will be restricting legally held firearms even further.
I filled in the additional comments bit too - I don't know if anybody ever reads them, but I think it's worth doing. If anyone wants to use my stuff or improve on it, you're welcome to:
B) Gun crime is already being tackled and there are very strict laws and harsh punishments in place. No further intervention from the European Commission is required on this issue.
C) The restrictions on legally held firearms used for sport, hunting and pest control are already far too strict. Legally held firearms are not criminal weapons, nor are they linked in any way to the criminal use of firearms.
The European Commission should not interfere with legally held firearms in any way.
D) The deactivation and security requirements for firearms are already very strict and tightly controlled, and there are no changes that could be made which would improve public safety. Intervention from the European Commission is not required.
But It seems the EU can't it keep its nose out of anything?
http://www.basc.org.uk/en/media/key_iss ... 313F7CFE14
I'd take the BASC approach on this - as the questions are biased for additional EU powers and controls select option 1 for everything, otherwise the next thing we'll find is the EU will be restricting legally held firearms even further.
I filled in the additional comments bit too - I don't know if anybody ever reads them, but I think it's worth doing. If anyone wants to use my stuff or improve on it, you're welcome to:
B) Gun crime is already being tackled and there are very strict laws and harsh punishments in place. No further intervention from the European Commission is required on this issue.
C) The restrictions on legally held firearms used for sport, hunting and pest control are already far too strict. Legally held firearms are not criminal weapons, nor are they linked in any way to the criminal use of firearms.
The European Commission should not interfere with legally held firearms in any way.
D) The deactivation and security requirements for firearms are already very strict and tightly controlled, and there are no changes that could be made which would improve public safety. Intervention from the European Commission is not required.
